On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 21:44:04 -0800, "CalifBill"
wrote:


"Jim" wrote in message
.. .

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

"Jim" wrote in message
...


The definition of peak to peak must have changed since I was in A
school. I was taught that positive peak to negative peak or negative
peak to positive peak shal be called peak to peak. (Neener Neener)

Sure. I don't disagree. Usually the term "peak to peak" relates to
amplitude measurements. But, a positive peak to the next negative peak
is 180 degrees if you are looking for frequency over a time period. A
positive peak to the next positive peak is 360 degrees. Or negative to
the next negative. Or any other point to the next repeating point on the
waveform.

Eisboch

360 degrees= 1 cycle is the description I was looking for. Quit trying to
confuse me with facts.
Check tonights Tampa news videos.

Actually may not be 360 degrees. What if it is a square wave?

The same way.