View Single Post
  #22   Report Post  
Steven Shelikoff
 
Posts: n/a
Default Overheating Perkins revisited.....

On 27 Aug 2003 03:52:13 -0700, (basskisser) wrote:

(Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ...
On 26 Aug 2003 04:26:22 -0700,
(basskisser) wrote:

(Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ...
On 22 Aug 2003 04:10:23 -0700,
(basskisser) wrote:

(Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message
Yup, I just knew you couldn't behave like a normal person. Your
despondency and frustrations are obviously gnawing at you. You really
should take a vacation before you pop a gasket. And you should stop
posting while you're drunk from all that homebrew.

Steve

Please provide any evidence that I was "drunk on homebrew". I love it.
I mention that I homebrew, and because you know I'm right, you simply
use that as a crutch, and probably will a lot! What do you disagree
with in my replys on this subject?

Your simplistic belligerant attitude which was obvious from your post:
Takes a real simpleton to neglect to change something as
common of a maintenence item as zincs on a boat.

Then when I explained why I didn't change heat exhanger pencil zinc and
that the real reason was more than just neglect, you snipped out the
explanation and responded with:
You LIAR!! See here, you yourself said that you are guilty of NEGLECT.
So, yes, I can read plain English, where you said that you neglected

Your simplistic belligerance and foolish bluster is the evidence that
you're an alcohol abuser, and is a common indicator. Since there is
evidence you were drunk and since you said you're a homebrewer, put 2
and 2 together and it's likely that you were drunk on your own homebrew.
But I'll conceed that there is also the possibility you went to the
store to buy your hooch.

"Evidence" I was drunk? You are one dumb person!!! Let's see, you'd be
able to establish, as "evidence" that someone is drunk by a newsgroup
post? Police agencies everywhere will want you to do this for them.


Yes, it is evidence you were drunk.

They'll call you and say, Steve, I think we've got a drunk driver
here, and want you to take a look at a newsgroup post we'll have him
make, to see if indeed he is!!! What a stupid, stupid man....


There's another one of your stupid strawman arguments. Just because
there is evidence you were drunk doesn't mean it's evidence that will
hold up in court in a drunk driver case. The way your simple, idiotic
mind works is really flabbergasting sometimes.

Steve


Do you understand, the difference between speculation and evidence.


Apparently you don't. I'm speculating you were drunk because there is
evidence you were. If there wasn't any evidence you were drunk, then I
wouldn't have speculated you were.

Again, you are just speculating. You think that because the all mighty
twit Steve says so, that it is evidence. What a ****ing moron you are.
So, let's see, everything that I say, whether there is ANY shred of
truth, or real evidence, I can, because I say so, CALL it evidence? I
can't? Hmm, you are!
So, I have evidence that Steve is a blow hard, who thinks he is always
right, and also thinks he is therefore an expert in everything. THAT
"evidence" proves, without a doubt that he is suffering from some
dilussional mental deficency. THAT in turn, is evidence that he should
be commited to a mental institution to get off of the drugs he is
taking.
See how that works, Steve? THAT is exactly what happens when people
like you are stupid enough to not know the difference between
speculation, and evidence.


Chasing your tail will only get you dizzy. Doing so in public will get
you laughed at.

Steve