BoatBanter.com - View Single Post

On 27 Aug 2003 12:12:12 -0700, (basskisser) wrote:

(Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ...
On 26 Aug 2003 12:30:30 -0700, (basskisser) wrote:

(Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ...
On 26 Aug 2003 04:05:26 -0700, (basskisser) wrote:

(Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ...
On 25 Aug 2003 04:43:29 -0700, (basskisser) wrote:

(Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message
On 22 Aug 2003 04:08:30 -0700, (basskisser) wrote:
Heeheeh!!!!! Here we go AGAIN!!!! Now he's a damned psychologist!!!!!!
Oh, this is great!!!!! WHat a laugh!!!!!!!

The maniacal laughter of a simpleminded lunatic.

Please provide proof that I am a lunatic. Again, are you trying to get

See above.

I guess you don't understand the word "proof"? Or is the above
statement, in your simple little mind, "proof" that someone is a
lunatic?

This is coming from someone who has no idea what proof means. You have
yet to prove a single one of your claims anywhere near to the extent
that I've proved you're a moron. As for this little proof, one of the
definitions of lunatic is wildly or giddidly foolish. Above, you're
laughing ("Heeheeh [...] WHat a laugh") for a foolish reason, misplaced
sarcasm. That meets one of the definitions of lunacy. So, there's your
proof ... you simpleminded idiot.

So, let's see, you are now saying that, if someone writes HEEHEE, in a
newsgroup, they are lunatics? How about your favorite LOL? Does that
make YOU a lunatic? Now I just can't wait to see what Rushlike
diatribe you come up with to tell the world YOU can write LOL, and not
be a lunatic, but if someone else writes HEEHEE, he IS a lunatic.
Pathetic.

There's that wonderful strawman arguement of yours again. You can't
argue the point I made so you throw out the strawman that I must be
saying that anyone who writes HEEHEE in a newsgroup is a lunatic when I
really said no such thing. If that's really what you read into what I
said and is not just some kind of stupid debating point you're trying to
win, then thats even more proof that you truly are a dummy.

I love it, now your keyword is "strawman", because you are getting
tangled up in your nonsensicle lies. Again, it's not a "stupid
debating point". Pray tell, what is the difference in what YOU said:

If you'd stop putting forth strawman arguments I'd stop pointing them
out. The fact that you can't read the above and see what the difference
is in what I said and what you're argueing against is pathetic.

Above, you're
laughing ("Heeheeh [...] WHat a laugh") for a foolish reason, misplaced
sarcasm. That meets one of the definitions of lunacy

Than in what I said? If you LOL for a foolish reason, misplaced
sarcasm.....use YOUR definition of lunacy, you in fact, would be just
as much a lunatic as I.

Except that you have no examples of it. Oh, and it's not my definition
of lunacy.

people to think that you now are an expert psychologist? What
credentials do you have to be able to make the above statements?

I already told you. I shouldn't have to again.

Oh, yes, you took the standard Psych. 101, so of course, in your mind,
you are an expert! I'm sorry, I forgot, everything that you've ever

Nope. You're wrong yet again. Keep up the good work. I never said I
was an expert. You won't be able to find a single post of mine where I
claimed to be an expert psychologist. It's only a figment of your
feeble mind that anyone who has more knowledge than you in a subject has
to be an expert in it. What I did say, and what is true, is that one
doesn't have to be an expert to see that you are an insecure blowhard
with an inferiority complex.

The only way you have more knowledge than I in the subject at hand,
Kenpo Karate, is in your own feeble mind. Are you really so stupid, or
are you just growing old and tired?

And again, you're arguing a strawman. I never said I had more knowledge
in Kenpo Karate than you. But it's the point you want to argue, for no
apparent reason other than it's one you think you can win You're just
frustrated because I won't play your little games and that the only
points I have engaged you in on every subject, you were wrong. I did
say that I must apparently know more than you since I was right and you
were wrong on 3 simple points concerning karate. But that's not the
same thing as saying I know more than you concerning Kenpo Karate no
matter whether you think it is or not.

BTW, you're even wrong concerning the subject at hand. It's NOT Kenpo
Karate. It's usage of motoroil. So again, I'll ask you whether you
think NONE of the oil that makes it's way back to the intake via the PCV
valve or breather gets burned?

You must think you are better than people that have trained all of
their lives in the field, because they would NEVER be so pretentious
as to be able to think they could actually diagnose someone by what
they write in newsgroups.

Yet another strawman on your part since you can't defend the against the
fact that your posts point toward you having an inferiority complex.

No, it is plain and simple truth. Do you think something different?
Why?

Because you are stupid if you actually believe for one second that I
think I'm better in psychology than people that have trained in
psychology all their lives simply because you make it so easy to point
out that you have an inferiority complex, and display that complex so
blatently.

Wrong again. In YOUR mind I must think I'm an expert since I
obviously
know more than you do.

Apparently you didn't see the "In YOUR mind" part, even though it stands
out pretty well, being capitalized and all.

Again, you have just stated: "I do know more than you about Karate".
Prove it. You can't, because you are a liar.

And again, you're wrong. You can't even comprehend what I said. Just
like the engineering points you were wrong on, you're to stupid to
understand why you're wrong.

Steve