OT--More NY Times bias
So I guess since President Bush has never been convicted of any of the
things you accuse him of doing, you must be a real ignorant dipstick.
Harry, you are making this way to easy. You are beginning to sound more and
more like Basskisser.
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...
This time, the so-called "Newspaper of Record" buried what was
arguably
the
biggest story on Tuesday.
Hmm. It's right there on the front page of its web site.
And in typical NY Times fashion, they write suppositions as fact:
"...Berger inadvertently removed..."
Inadvertently? According to whom? Berger? Eyewitnesses say that he
"inadvertently" stuffed them down his pants and socks.
This is still the united states, dipstick, and berger hasn't been
convicted of anything. Ergo, the assumption is he is innocent.
Did you not take a basic civics class - ever?
|