"John H." wrote in message
...
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 09:57:41 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould
wrote:

On Jan 5, 8:28?am, HK wrote:
wrote:
On Jan 5, 10:38 am, wrote:
On Jan 5, 9:11 am, wrote:

On Jan 5, 8:50 am, John H. wrote:
to your latest anti-Bush AIDS bull****. Seems he's doing a good
enough job
for the Times to actually give him some praise.
http://tinyurl.com/2xqj8c
--
John H
And this is not new news. GWB has been sending billions to the world
for AIDS as long as he has been in the Whitehouse. Last time I heard
of an aid package to South Africa of 15 billion. He has spent more
on
AIDS than any other president, you just have of course not hear
about
it much, kinda' like the surge in Iraq ? ? ? Vast right wing
conspiracy...
Yes, Bush is the bestest, most humanitarian, economic, smartest,
diplomatic, domestic, foreign, thrifty nifty president EVER.........

What do you have against facts. Did I say he was the best? No? I
stated facts, based on "tangible assets", namely cash... What is your
problem, double standard? Now, just for comparison, IIRC, Billary gave
less than 8 billion during it's administration. Is there some kind of
math I am not aware of, cause if not, then nothing I said was remotely
amiss.

There's little funnier in politics than watching the diminishing dregs
of Bush supporters standing up for their man.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

On the positive side, loyalty is an excellent personal quality.
While it may be accurate that a majority of Americans are less-than-
happy with GWB, it's posible to admire those who continue to defend
his policies and leadership. The fact that a person may hold a
different opinion on a controversial subject doesn't make that person
either bad or stupid. Folks still passionately defending the current
administration should be commended for their loyalty to a professed
cause- many people would have defected from the ranks a long time ago.
Some have.

GWB may not be the very best president ever, but among those who
continue to support him despite everything he has and has not done in
seven years are some darn fine Americans. Who knows? 25-30 years from
now history may prove the Bush Doctrine and his domestic policies to
be extremely well founded. Or not.

But on the negative side, you're lending credence to a Krause comment.
--
John H
Harry can't be off the wall 100% of the time. He has to slip up once in a
while.