JimH wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
. ..
JimH wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
. ..
JimH wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
. ..
Steve wrote:
On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 23:05:11 -0500, HK
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 21:24:13 -0500, HK
wrote:

Tim wrote:
On Dec 21, 8:18 pm, "Lu Powell"
wrote:

As in developed in Israel for Israel.
And nothing but the Israel....

Well, I suppose we have our own ways of wasting billions of tax
dollars on our military.
Harry, do you take *yourself* seriously?
--
John H

*Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!*
For the money we've *wasted* on the military in Iraq, we could have
rebuilt New Orleans, fixed the levees for real, made many needed
I would rather spend money on *anything* than rebuilding below sea
level in an area ripe with corruption.

Steve
Well, much of Iraq is above sea level, but it is ripe with corruption,
so guess that's okay with you.
I believe you really understand the reason we needed to go into Iraq
and realize the successes we have had in our fight against
terrorists..........I also believe you are purposely ignoring those
facts just to show support to your party, the Democrats.

Carry on. We understand.
We went into Iraq because Bush was dying in the polls, of course, and
his neoncon puppetmasters thought a bit of warmongering would help him.

That's it, in a nutshell.
Regardless...........we are winning and our children, their children,
their grandchildren.......and so on........will not have to live in fear.

Nothing we are doing in Iraq is going to minimize the onslaught of islamic
terrorism.

GB's plan seems to be working................perfectly!

And you know it. '-)



Too much hot buttered rum for you tonight, Jim? You're climbing up the
ladder of absurdity. Unless, of course, you are referring to Bush's plan
to bankrupt this country and make us the most hated country in the
world. He's succeeding at that.