posted to rec.boats
|
Senior Member
|
|
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Apr 2007
Posts: 7,590
|
|
Life in other worlds...
On Dec 22, 1:42*pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
. ..
wrote:
On Dec 22, 10:17 am, HK wrote:
wrote:
On Dec 22, 10:00 am, HK wrote:
Steve wrote:
On 21-Dec-2007, "Mike" wrote:
Harry, do you honestly mean that we (the U.S.) would be better off
with no
military?
What's the difference? - we have a great military and no country.
Actually, all we have is a military that can take on and defeat some
third, fourth or fifth-rate countries in the world. We do not have a
military that could take on the Red Chinese or, in a few years, the
Russians.
What we don't have is the ability to defeat *some* third, fourth, or
fifth-rate countries and then rebuild them into something we like,
which
was the fantasy of the idiots in the Bush Administration.
We got our butts handed to us in Vietnam by a practically non-country
armed with little more than the determination of its leaders and
followers. We fought to no better than a draw in Korea.
The last serious, bigtime war our military won was WW II, and that
only
with the help of many allies around the world.
Our most successful military activity of the last 50 years was George
H.W. Bush's repulsion of Iraq from Kuwait. He, unlike his son, was
smart
enough to know what to do, how to do it, who to involve and when to
get
out.
Oh, our military could win almost any war if lunatics like you would
just let them shoot back
Yeah, that's the fantasy, you got it. There was plenty of "shooting
back" in Iraq and Vietnam. Our military defeated Iraq's military. Big
deal.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Iraq is free, the surge is working, they are passing laws at least as
effectively as the current congress, oh yeah, and there has been less
individual attacks against innocent Americans during this
administration than there was in the last... 1 + 1 is still 2.
Cripes. You sound like one of the Bush Admin apologists.
This line of yours is incredible:
" less individual attacks against innocent Americans during this
*administration than there was in the last... 1 + 1 is still 2."
3000+ innocent Americans died on 9-11. That was during *this*
administration.
Lets count 9/11 as one attack. *The last one had an attack on the WTC, the
USS Cole, a bunch of embassies, and probably a few others I can not recall
at the moment.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Harry has comprehension problems when it comes to ideology, and he
calls me simple...
|