wrote:
On Dec 20, 10:58 am, John H. wrote:
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 07:47:41 -0800 (PST), wrote:
On Dec 20, 10:13 am, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 20:04:23 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould
wrote:
On Dec 19, 4:08?pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/908
There is evidence as well as scientific opinion on both sides of the
human-influence factor. Neither your side or the other should trot out
a single study and say "see, that settles it." (Not that you are).
It's amazing the number of people who not only deny that many could
ever have any influence on his global environment, but also insist
that the climate is *not* changing at all...........
It's amazing the number of people who preach that man is solely responsible
for global warming and that many billions of dollars in the right pockets
will stop it.
*That's* what's amazing!
--
John H
John, just *who* preaches that man is "solely responsible for global
warming"?
Whoooosh!
--
John H- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Whoosh, my ass. Did you make that statement or not? Do you believe the
statement that YOU wrote, or aren't you a man of conviction?

"are you a man"? That sound very familiar, Sally. But that wouldn't
have been you posting it here, right?