|
posted to rec.boats
|
|
external usenet poster
|
|
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,728
|
|
Settled science? HA!!
Jim wrote:
"BAR" wrote in message
. ..
HK wrote:
wrote:
But you don't know what we listen to, and even if you did, you would
not listen to it so you would still not know what you are talking
about. It's ok Harry, we have gotten kind of used to it."
I've seen a few "reich wing radio" types on TV interview shows. They
are without exception scum. Note that I am not talking about
responsible conservatives espousing their point of view. I see those
folks and I listen to what they have to say. Sometimes I agree with
some of what they say and sometimes I don't. But I don't believe them
to be irresponsible buffoons.
What is your definition of a "responsible conservative?" What
characteristics do you use to identify a "responsible conservative?"
The "reich wing radio" types I am talking about the douche bags, like
Limbaugh, Coulter, Malkin, Hannity, O'Reilly, et cetera. Scum of the
earth.
Limbaugh is funny and entertaining.
Coulter is funny and entertaining.
Malkin is funny and entertaining.
Hannity is a pompous ass.
O'Reilly is a pompous ass.
Thank god Imus is back.;-)
I can't stand Imus, I put him in the Hannity O'Reilly bucket.
|