"jamesgangnc" wrote in message
...
"HK" wrote in message
...
jamesgangnc wrote:
Without any compression? Are you sure about that. Cause the lossless
formats only achieve about a 70% reduction in file size so you get
around 2 cds or so per gig. Default ripping with itunes uses the apple
acc compression which is a lossy algorythm. Mp3 is also lossy.

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"Don White" wrote in message
...
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
Like this:
http://www.alteclansing.com/index.ph...iproduct_id=64

or:

http://www.circuitcity.com/ssm/iHome...oductDetail.do

The heir to my fortune and empire is apparently enamored of these
toys. Interested in feedback if you've got something like this. I
think it's a mistake and that a guy should have an actual stereo
system, even if this means getting rid of his roommate to make space
in the dorm room. The prince doesn't agree.
The 'kids' are hoked on the iPods or reasonable facimilie.
No point fighting it.
My son has had one for a couple of years , and asked for a new model
this Christmas. Of course his mom ran right out and plopped down
$400.00 + taxes for it.
It was a lot cheaper back in the days of the old 45s.


If we eliminate HD radio from the discussion for the moment, an iPod is
probably no worse than listening to FM radio, which munges up the music
to an extent. My son's at least using music files pulled directly from
CDs for the most part, without any compression that he's applied. So,
at least he's not at the mercy of radio stations. But then, he's
listening with earbuds, which suck, according to my ears. I offered to
get him a set of nice Sennheiser 400-series open air headphones, but
he's not interested.

He's always right, ya know?


MP4 320 kbps


Still lossy. I haven't found anyone that could really tell the difference
though. The problem comes in when you want to switch formats from one
lossy to another lossy. That's why it's always better to go back to the
original uncompressed source. Also why I very seldom buy music off
itunes, because then you never get a copy of the uncompressed song.



At the "better settings", it's difficult to tell the difference. And,
whether it matters or not often depends on the purpose of the file you're
creating. If I need to send a song to a band member, to settle the "Are we
talking about the same song here?" question, and he's one of these people
whose email is always close to fill, I'll shrink a 15mb song down to 1mb. It
sounds hideous, but at least I get the answer I'm looking for.

If I have to listen to that same song on my stereo every day for a week,
while learning it, then it has to be the original or very close to it.
Otherwise, it grates on my nerves.