"HK" wrote in message
...
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 19:48:19 -0500, HK wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 19:34:53 -0500, HK wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 19:22:00 -0500, HK
wrote:

Eisboch wrote:
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/908
Another qualified voice of reason.
Refreshing.

Now, if we can stop the madness before we all go broke trying to
fix a nonexistent problem.

Almost everyone who has the contrary opinion on our impact on global
warming is a Republican. That tells me what I need to know about the
"opposition."
So if I were to tell you that a quick search of the FEC database
pulls
up two of those contributors and they both are donors to the DNC,
would that change your opinion on their veracity?
Nope.
My statement stands..."almost everyone..."
Ah - I see.

You are truly amazing.
Because I can construct simple sentences to say what I mean with a bit
of precision?

"Almost everyone who has the contrary opinion on our impact on global
warming is a Republican." What is there about that sentence you find
confusing?

It's not - I understood it perfectly.

Its' just an example of your ability to blame one group while at the
same time absolving your chosen group of any responsibility even
though they both believe the same thing.

It is truly amazing.


I'm not "blaming" anyone or absolving anyone else. I am merely pointing
out a truth, that the "man is not a contributor to Global Warming
syndrome" is a mostly Republican ailment.

I read and interpret the studies as a scientific debate. Haven't a clue as
to the various author's political leanings .... well except AGore, but he's
not a scientist.

Eisboch