On Dec 16, 7:39 am, HK wrote:
wrote:
On Dec 16, 12:25 am, wrote:
On Sat, 15 Dec 2007 22:23:14 -0500, HK wrote:
You implied there was some conspiracy for certain media outlets to
support a "weak" Republican. That means you are presuming there is some
"strong" Republican among the wanna-be's. There ain't.
Who's your boy on the GOP side? I need a laugh.
This is certainly going to be another election where the winner gets
42-43% (but that was how Bill got in).
Dodd pointed out in one of the early debates that more than half of
the people polled say they could not vote for Hillary under any
circumstance and she is the strongest candidate on either side.
Pretty sad

As long as we don't get another Clinton presidency, I don't think our
intellignece and military services could take another stripping, and
we certainly don't want to sell any more of our missle and nuke
technology to them for a few million in late campaign contributions
like last time..

What are you talking about? Hillary is the toughest guy running.

As for stripping down the military, Bush has been doing precisely that
for the last seven years.

Not much we can do about China these days, after seven years of it
buying our paper, eh?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I like them buying our paper more now than haveing free reign over our
military secrets for the 8 before that. Like I said Harry, only you
doubt my suggestions in this thread, and we knew that before I even
posted