On Dec 4, 6:41 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:
wrote in message

...





On Dec 4, 4:39 pm, "Calif Bill" wrote:
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message

...

wrote in message
...
On Dec 4, 11:24 am, John H. wrote:
On Tue, 04 Dec 2007 14:55:12 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"

wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 04 Dec 2007 13:52:17 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"HK" wrote in message
om...
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Calif Bill" wrote in message
...
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
.. .
wrote in message
...
On Dec 3, 1:31 pm, "Calif Bill"
wrote:
wrote in message

...

On Dec 3, 2:15 am, "Calif Bill"
wrote:
You want investment advice?
Not from the handyman.
Better than from a pothead.
True, I'd have to agree with that. Why, are you a pothead,
too?

Bill probably thinks pot is a gateway drug, orders of
magnitude
more
dangerous than booze.

Why do you suppose that? Loogy, the former Atl_man, the
former
on_lanier, and the former basskisser seems to think stating
that
he is
growing pot on a pot newsgroup means he was spouting lies
then.
Or
lies
now. As to the pot, my opinion is legalize and tax most
drugs.
If
you
steal to support your habit, you get an extension to your
sentence.
If
you can afford the drugs and not be a burden on society, it's
freedom
of
choice. I graduated from San Francisco State University, so
knew
lots
of people who used pot. I do not use any drugs, as I get sick
with
most
prescription painkillers, and I do not smoke. Earn a lot of
money
from
smoking as Altria has done very well for me. Better than RTN
and
your
other choices.

You do seem to attach a certain stigma or evil to pot, though,
which is
silly, since it's really no worse for the body than booze,
assuming
both
are abused to a certain level. And, it's pretty rare that
people
steal
to
get money for pot.

I sort of dropped out of this discussion, which I initiated. How
did it
devolve into an argument about pot?

I steered it off a cliff after billy bob said "Better than a
pothead".
Since
I love words, I see "pothead" and wonder why people never say
"bourbon
head"
or "vodka head". It's always more than just a term learned by
habit.
It's
a
belief based on who-knows-what.

Would 'booze hound' be the equivalent? Or just, 'a drunk'?
--
John H

Maybe, but people like Bill use "pothead" to describe anyone who
uses
pot.
"Booze hound" or "drunk" are more commonly used to describe someone
whose
use of alcohol has reached the point of habitual abuse. There are
people who
partake of marijuana at levels similar to someone who has a glass of
wine
once or twice a week. Nobody would call those people drunks,
although
they
might GET a little drunk from that glass of wine under certain
conditions.

Oh. I didn't realize Bill was expanding the term 'pothead' to include
anyone who tries the stuff. I would put 'pothead' in the same
category
as
'alcoholic'.
--
John H- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Oh, it gets even better. Bill has been proven to call someone a
"pothead" without ANY evidence of such. Hell, he doesn't even have to
have heresay to call someone a pothead!

hearsay

Not hearsay or heresay, but a posting in one of his incarnations of
newsgroup posting.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

If in your stupid mind, it's not hearsay, then it must be proof????
Damn you are dumb.

You are the one who stated you grew the evil weed.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Hehe!! I just love how you prove yourself dumb every single day here!
Watch, everyone! Bill, let's see the proof you have that *I* "stated"
that *I* "grew the evil weed".