On Nov 23, 6:27 pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 18:11:22 -0500, HK wrote:
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 08:40:27 -0500, HK wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...1/22/EDNKTDK1S...

You really have to wonder if the elected folks in California don't
have anything to do.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/liv...ml?in_article_...

Kill a baby - save the world?

Wow - there's a concept.

I must have missed the part where the woman killed a baby.

""I realised then that a baby would pollute the planet -- and that
never having a child was the most environmentally friendly thing I
could do," she told the Daily Mail."

'Nuff said. She said so herself.

So?

Never mind Harry - you're ****ed off about something and you just want
to argue.

So, put the Parker away for the winter yet? I'm planning on making a
short trip to SC between now and Christmas.

I fail to see the problem, it is nothing more than voluntary natural
selection. These people know in their hearts that they are unfit to
pass on their genes so they dont. Lets applaud them for knowing they
are unfit to breed. Likewise abortion is nothing more than
infanticide by the unfit, it's fine by me. All of this will improve
the species. They look for a face saving way to decide not to breed
and eco-silliness comes up. Encourage it.