On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 11:35:18 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:


"BillP" wrote in message
news:FEE%i.186$e35.124@trnddc08...
Thinking people would like to see the data. The IPCC releases summary,
after summary, but no hard data.
One has to wonder why?

This man was selected by the IPCC to act as a reviewer and even he hasn't
been allowed to see the underlying data, only copies of *unpublished*
studies used be the IPCC to form their "consensus"
http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=640

"What sort of peer review is it, when the peer reviewer cannot see the
data used or the supporting calculations?"

Scientists don't draw conclusions by "consensus". At least they shouldn't.

Exactly. In particular when 50% of the "scientists" are people nobody
who study climatology have ever heard of.

Just wait until they figure out that it's really cosmic rays and lack
of solar output to deflect them that's causing all the ruckus.