On Nov 17, 11:49 am, "BillP" wrote:
"Eisboch" wrote in message

...







"BillP" wrote in message
news:FEE%i.186$e35.124@trnddc08...
Thinking people would like to see the data. The IPCC releases summary,
after summary, but no hard data.
One has to wonder why?

This man was selected by the IPCC to act as a reviewer and even he hasn't
been allowed to see the underlying data, only copies of *unpublished*
studies used be the IPCC to form their "consensus"
http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=640

"What sort of peer review is it, when the peer reviewer cannot see the
data used or the supporting calculations?"

Scientists don't draw conclusions by "consensus". At least they
shouldn't.

Eisboch

"The report is important because it is adopted by consensus, meaning
countries accept the underlying science and cannot disavow its conclusions."- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

The REPORT, not the data. Anyone who thinks that emitting millions of
tons of CO2, heavy metals, thousands of different compounds, etc. into
the air every day isn't having an adverse affect on the Earth is a
moron.