On Nov 14, 8:34?am, "Del Cecchi"
wrote:
"Chuck Gould" wrote in message

ups.com...

snip

"The events of the 1990's may well offer a preview of how the Arctic
will respond over longer periods of time in a warming world". (looks
like the theme, "Global warming is a bs conspiracy dreamed up by
liberals" won't reallybe found anywhere in this article)

Of course not. Whether or not the authors believed global warming is
true or is not true, saying so in an article would be a "career limiting
move" at the least. It is dangerous to flout orthodoxy openly.

del

Nothing in this article directly addresses global warming as a general
phenomenon, although there are references to it existing in the
present and future projections of a possibly "warming world".

The scientist quoted has beach balls. "Last winter was pretty extreme,
but it now looks like the trend is turning around" Huh? What trend?
The last three weeks?

Oh well, it will be fun to hear what Rush does with this thing. I
wonder if he'll accuse the climatologists of relocating the
temperature probes "to the sunny side of brick buildings and closer to
the asphalt" in the arctic. :-)
Maybe not, because if you pull the *right* stuff out of context in
this item it supports the position that the climate isn't really
changing at all.