Bert Robbins wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
WaIIy wrote:

On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 11:58:18 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:

We don't value life much in the United States, not, of course, unless it
is a fetus. Then we'll kill to protect it.

No, you would just elect to kill the baby.

No judge, no jury, no conscience.


It's not a baby, it's a fetus. And the decision over whether to stay
pregnant or not is a decision that rightfully belongs to the mother and
her medical specialist.

Depends upon what you believe. You obviously take the convienent view to
your goal of promoting behavior where responsibility is not wanted.

What I believe is the promotion of privacy and the ability of citizens
to make medical decisions in conjunction with their medical professionals.


You righties, but not necessarily you, Wally, are absolute hypocrites on
the false "right-to-life" issue. Most righties don't give a tinker's
dam about the problems millions of children already here facr in terms
of medical care, shelter, food, clothing and enjoying a modest lifestyle.

This gets back to responsibility. Why should I be held monitarily and
socially responsible for your lack of judgement in having wanton sex.


We're talking about the children here, dummy, not their parents.
OF course, as a conservative GOP'er, you really don't give a damn about
the children or the problems they face. After all, they've been
born...and don't need championing, eh?