"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
WaIIy wrote:

On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 11:58:18 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:

We don't value life much in the United States, not, of course, unless it
is a fetus. Then we'll kill to protect it.

No, you would just elect to kill the baby.

No judge, no jury, no conscience.


It's not a baby, it's a fetus. And the decision over whether to stay
pregnant or not is a decision that rightfully belongs to the mother and
her medical specialist.

Depends upon what you believe. You obviously take the convienent view to
your goal of promoting behavior where responsibility is not wanted.

As I said before, if you had a child of yours that was born in the second
tri-mester and is thriving your view would be different.

You righties, but not necessarily you, Wally, are absolute hypocrites on
the false "right-to-life" issue. Most righties don't give a tinker's
dam about the problems millions of children already here facr in terms
of medical care, shelter, food, clothing and enjoying a modest lifestyle.

This gets back to responsibility. Why should I be held monitarily and
socially responsible for your lack of judgement in having wanton sex.

Sometimes I think righties are anti-choice because prevention of
abortions provides plenty of fodder for military expansionism.

You already have the choice to have sex or not have sex. If you have sex and
a pregnancy results you have the responsibility to stand up and take
responsibility and raise the child.