View Single Post
  #70   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Reginald P. Smithers III Reginald P. Smithers III is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,557
Default 113 gallons per hour...

HK wrote:


Isn't it amazing, Wayne, that when I put up a post about boating that is
even slightly controversial, it provokes lots of boating-related
discussion?

Have a nice day.


Actually, this was a great thread, because it did encourage lots of
boating related discussion. The problem with your surtax is it would
not be any real impact on our national consumption of fuel. The only
way to do that is to substantially increase the tax all fuel to
encourage new technology for alternative energy and the use of fuel
efficient cars. Your surcharge on boating related fuel, at best, would
put small boat mfg'ers out of business. These are the same ones you
wish would stay in business.

I do agree with Eisboch, that the government has consistently proven to
be the least effective way to encourage innovation and effective
research to solve complex problems. I would use the tax to encourage
private businesses to find solutions, via tax incentives to those who
are able to find effective solutions.

It does seem that your surcharge on fuel is like everyone's tax
recommendations, they want the next guy to pay the tax, and not them.
Your tax would not really provide a solution, but seemed to be designed
to punish those who have a bigger boat just because they have a bigger
boat.