"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:


http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...nm/20040711/ts
_nm/iraq_weapons_dc

Why would you care, NOYB?

You guys have spent the last year convincing everybody that it was never
(really) about WMD from the get-go, that Bush never said we had to invade
Iraq
because Saddam or the WMD posed any sort of threat to the US, and etc.

'Course, should *that* story (never said there were WMD in Iraq) prove
unsupportable in the end the fall back position is in place, "If we said
anything about WMD it was due to an intelligence failure."

You guys are squirming like a nightcrawler on a hook.

Bush has always maintained that there were several reasons for invading
Iraq. However, as Wolfowitz said in an interview soon after the war, "WMD
was the one issue we could all (Dems and Republicans) agree upon".

Apparently, the Dems quit agreeing once they saw a political angle to
exploit.