Well, at least you can be trained like a dog.

Steve

On 11 Jul 2004 13:42:05 GMT, (JAXAshby) wrote:

schlackoff, in the unlikely event you might understand this, here goes as you
requested.


schlackoff, you are too stupid for words.

schlackoff, you are too stupid for words.

schlackoff, you are too stupid for words.

schlackoff, you are too stupid for words.

schlackoff, you are too stupid for words.

schlackoff, you are too stupid for words.

schlackoff, you are too stupid for words.



schlackoff, you are too stupid for words.

Jox, why don't you say it one more time. idiot.

Steve

schlackoff, you are too stupid for words.

Oh, good one! Is that your sense of irony coming through again?

Steve

schlackoff, diesel engines with spark plugs are called "multi-fuel"
engines
and
are rare.

Which proves you can't read. It didn't say "spark" plugs.

schlackie, you were caught with a fish hook in your mouth.

Joxitchbe, you were caught in yet another blunder. Add it to the list.

Steve

For sure it did, for the author specificly mentioned the crew of the
ill-fated
vessel was so anxious about the trip that they went to the boat the
night
before leaving to clean the plugs on the engine.

One sentence, just one sentence, but it clearly shows the Andrea Gail
had
a
gasoline engine. At least in the First Edition (for those out there
who
know
what a First Edition is, the rest of you can go fry an egg).

THAT's it? That's what you're basing your assertion that the Andrea
Gail had a gas engine on? No mention of the type of engine? No
mention
of fuel? Jax, FYI, diesel engines can have plugs also. So it could
have been a diesel engine and the author not even be wrong in his
statement. If he had actually said it was a gas engine, he surely
would
have been wrong.

Since you know so much about gas engines, what model gas engine do you
think it had?

Steve