View Single Post
  #66   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Calif Bill Calif Bill is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,727
Default Brigadier General Paul Tibbets, RIP


"HK" wrote in message
news
thunder wrote:
On Sat, 03 Nov 2007 23:51:40 -0700, Chuck Gould wrote:


I can't say that if I were in Truman's shoes at the time I would have
decided any differently- nor can anybody else who wasn't there (or even
born) at the time.


Obviously, nor can we say, with any certainty, that the Japanese would
have surrendered without the use of A-bombs. However, forty years after
the war, their plans to defend against the invasion were declassified.
If they were implemented, they definitely would have cost a major number
of American lives.

http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acro.../downfall.html



I always thought the Germans were far more deserving of having a couple of
nukes dropped on their cities, but the European war ended before that
could happen.


Why? The European theater was a lot less nasty than the South Pacific.
Something like 5% of the German prisoners died in captivity, and that
includes those wounded when captured. Japan killed about 39% of the
prisoners.