|
posted to rec.boats
|
|
external usenet poster
|
|
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,557
|
|
Best cleaner for river slime
HK wrote:
John H. wrote:
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 08:40:07 -0400, HK wrote:
John H. wrote:
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 08:29:22 -0400, HK wrote:
thunder wrote:
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 07:35:47 -0500, John H. wrote:
I defer to your expertise. But why go with a cheap AMD?
AMD is no longer the "cheap" chip, and hasn't been for several
years. Using benchmarks, AMD has given Intel a run for the
money. It seems, lately, the speed lead has been switching back
and forth, with every new generation of chip.
http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu_2007.html
The cheap AMD chips are cheap indeed, but there's nothing wrong
with them, and the high-end AMD chips are as thunder sez.
You are undoubtedly correct. But, when you were telling us about the
computer you were building, didn't you say you were using an Intell
chip?
Yup. But unless you are a high-end gamer or use certain
processor-optimized apps (of which there are almost none), you're not
going to notice any speed difference between a high-end Intel and a
high-end AMD CPU. The only computer game I have installed on this
desktop is MS Golf.
Well! That explains both.
Better greens fees with MS Golf. I shoot in the low 60's.
yes, but what do you tip the caddie?
|