Thread
:
Another History Channel Special
View Single Post
#
3
posted to rec.boats.cruising
Mark Borgerson
external usenet poster
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2006
Posts: 171
Another History Channel Special
In article .com,
says...
On Oct 20, 9:42 am, "Roger Long" wrote:
Do you think that car model had true scale thickness body panels?
--
Roger Long
No... looks as if it's solid, machined out to mount the motor, running
gear and other parts. I saw the real one once in parts on a microscope
slide at the SAE congress. They had the assembled one driving a figure
8 course they had carved into a dime.
If that were a goal, it could be accomplished. The bumpers were scale
thickness IIRC. I think when they made this car it cost 35 million to
tool up to build it.
It would seem a ships hull would be a breeze compared to a running
auto to build 1/1000th scale.
I agree with your statement to a point, but wonder if the
compartments in a ship of scale would provide more support than full
scale allowing you to pick up a ship model without it folding.
It is amazing how "fragile" ships are. Once during a storm in the
S.China sea I remember looking down a ships cargo handling passage way
and seeing the ship twist and flex by several feet each way....like a
wet noodle.
If you scale the ship down by 1000, that means that you would
scale the weight down by 1x10^9. The original Titanic was
882 feet long and weighed about 92 million pounds. A
TRUE scale model would be about 10.6 inches long and weigh
only 1.48 ounces!
The scaled down 1" hull plating would be just 0.001"---
about the thickness of aluminum foil. I guess it
might be a bit difficult to pick up that model
without denting the hull plates.
OTOH, if you had picked up the original Titanic with
a strap 60 or 70 feet wide under the middle of
the hull, it probably would have crumpled too!
Mark Borgerson
Reply With Quote
Mark Borgerson
View Public Profile
Find all posts by Mark Borgerson