NORDHAVN Rewrites Physics Textbooks
I trust you studied my numbers?
toad wrote:
How does the windmill know the wind is not true wind? It has no
concept of 'true' wind, it lives exclusively in apparent wind.
It doesn't know the difference.
Assume the windmill direct into wind concept works:
You can take your windmill cart, put it on another cart and tow it at
20kts. It sees 20kts and will move forwards along its cart. If you
stop the cart and blow 20kts at the windmill cart it will move
forwards at exactly the same speed.
Same speed *relative to the the surface it is on*.
In other words there is some spare energy left over to drive the cart
forwards after the energy required to hold the windmill in equilibrium
with the wind is expended. In my example above that spare energy is
used to drive the cart forwards but in your example of the windmill on
the foredeck that surplus energy can be used to save petrol.
Now we both accept that idea is laughable so you have to explain why
it's not laughable when the wind blowing is caused by nature.
...but most importantly, why oh why oh why doesn't someone just post
the mathmatical proof, the last time this came up I said I'd leave the
thread 'till proof turned up and none did. Odd that.
Lets take this step by step.
Do you accept that it is possible for the cart to move directly upwind?
Andy.
|