wrote in message
ups.com...
On Oct 11, 11:26 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

ups.com...





On Oct 11, 11:13 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
"John H." wrote in message

news

On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 14:39:55 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:59:59 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
m...
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:33:04 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
news:n41sg3ha18nnovjo8devhjfgrgqm8oennc@4ax. com...

There are other reasons a woman might not get treatment for
a
few
days.
If
you're not aware of this....you know why.

Now you're making your population *very* small. Maybe sex
education
in
school should tell females to get treatment as soon as
possible
after
the
rape.

Considering that a girl could have a father like you, it's no
surprise
that
she might wait before dealing with the results of rape.

If either of my daughters had been raped, I would have
supported
their
taking the morning-after pill as soon as possible.

Perhaps you could explain the necessity of your derogatory
comments?
Have
I
called you names, put down your fathering abilities,
questioned
your
manhood? Why do you find it necessary to make a personal
attack
in
every
post?

Search for your last 100 messages and read them. That should
answer
your
question.

I cannot find one instance wherein I've called you anything. I
may
have
found your arguments specious, your name-calling remarkable, and
your
demeanor nauseating, but I've called you no names that I could
find.

I never said you called me names. I explained that many of your
messages
contain a reason for you being called names. Matter of fact, some
of
them
can be considered an explicit request for mistreatment.

So my commenting on your specious arguments, your name-calling,
and/or
your
nauseating demeanor, or my not answering 'loaded' questions are
reasons
to
call me names. And you seem to share the name calling with others
in
the
group, so I don't feel too badly.

How about your ugly habit of whining about off topic posts, and
within
minutes, posting your own off topic messages as you see fit?

I don't recall your definition of 'sot'. Did you provide one,
using
the
same criteria you desire for 'socialism'?

"

I whine about your political trolls which are well known to cause
conflict.
Live with it, as you seem not to have the courage to test your
mettle
in a
political forum.

I will assume that a dictionary definition of socialism should do
for
you.
The next time somebody uses the word, and you ask for the
definition,
I'll
be sure to respond with, "You have a dictionary. Use it."

You forgot to look up "sot".- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

S.O.T. Sit-on-top. A small plastic kayak like a Pungo made for flat
water. You don't sit in them, you sit on top of them. Of course Joe
probably has some other meaning only he thinks is clever. I wonder if
there is anyone else on the group that could not get a single fishing
invite.. unless it's to beat the **** out of him and make a fool of
him;(

Au contraire, Clevis. Captain Francis has invited me, although I suspect
he
regrets having done so by now. :-)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I doubt it. T is a charitable kind of guy.. Even takes me fishin'.
However iirc the invite was to beat the **** out of you fishin' and
make a fool of you. But after your initial "your spot, your terms",
you started changing the conditions....


He offered a choice of venues, if I recall, Clevis.