"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 19:44:47 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
. ..
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 19:19:55 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
m...
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:15:48 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
news:47qpg3hak6887fq1cfs7mkankl3sch1mcu@4ax. com...
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 12:11:32 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

Which stance did Romney take on reproductive rights?

I'm constantly amused by the phrase - "reproductive rights".

What exactly are "reproductive rights"?

Example: Deciding whether to continue a pregnancy after a woman's been
raped.

That's abortion rights.

I want to know what "reproductive rights" are.

Same thing.

No they are not the same thing.

OK. We're done with this branch of the thread. Have a nice day.

What? I thought you were intellectually curious - give it a good
debate.

Here's the crux of the issue. The issue is abortion rights, not
reproductive rights.

My/mine and you/yours and everybody else here have "reproductive"
rights - meaning that we have the right to reproduce if we so choose
to do so.

"Reproductive rights" has no meaning in the context of abortion.

Changing the name from abortion rights to reproductive rights doesn't
make the subject more palatable except to idiot liberal do-gooders who
seem to think that they can reframe the argument and make people
swallow the pill if it's less offensive.

I would have thought you might have not swallowed that kind of kool
aid.

I don't view the two terms as having vastly different "flavors", so to me,
they're interchangeable.