wrote in message
ups.com...
On Oct 10, 12:08 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
wrote in message

ups.com...





On Oct 10, 11:51 am, HK wrote:
wrote:
On Oct 10, 11:36 am, HK wrote:
wrote:
On Oct 10, 11:14 am, HK wrote:
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 13:00:31 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
If you knew anything at all about Romney, you'd know he's a
chameleon. He'll say whatever his audience hopes for with
regard
to certain
subjects.
It's called triangulation - look it up.
He's stated so many different things with regard to
reproductive
choice
Now it's "reproductive choice"?
Please to 'splain this "reproductive choice".
In my household, "reproductive choice" means it is entirely up to
a
woman whether she wants to become pregnant and, if she does,
whether
she
wants the pregnancy to continue.
Simple enough.
We're 100% "reproductive choice" here. Many of the Republican
candidates
are anti-abortion. That's the real definition of "pro-life."-
Hide
quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I understand your positition, unless it has changed in the last
few
years, you beleive in choice with no parental notification right
down
to grade school... Don't make me google this, you said it. Does
the
father have a choice? Do my kids have a chioce, say they want to
carry
a bible to school? Or have a negative opinion of gays? How about
recruit for the military? Make a commercial? Have an airshow?
Celebrate Christmas and Easter??? Of course not, you do not
beleive
in
"choice" you beleive in self indulgence... Like most ideological
liberals, which unfortunately seems to be the mainstream lately...
1. If a grade-school girl is pregnant, the police should be called.
Her
father probably is the father.

2. If a girl is 14 or older, it should be up to her whether to
notify
her parents. The decision to proceed with an abortion, though,
should
be
hers alone.

So you have changed your positition on notification, That is good...

3. The male who made the female pregnant has no choice.

4. A child should be able to carry any book to school, including
the
bible. I carried Joyce's Ulysses to school in the 7th grade so I
could
participate in our junior high's lit club.

5. You are entitled to have "negative" opinions of any group of
people
you like. That negative feeling, though, cannot carry over into
hiring,
housing, transportation, et cetera.

6. Military recruitment. I have no objection to military recruiters
having a booth and handing out literature at a high school "career"
day.
I do believer military recruiters at such venues have
"monitors."

Monitors? You mean protestors to shut down their free speech right?

7. My daughter made radio and television commercials beginning at
the
age of seven. Took her only three spots to pay her AFTRA initiation
and
dues.

8. Airshow? Dunno what you mean in this context.

7 + 8 are references to military commercials and airshows not being
allowed in California, even though they shut down the streets and
such
for anyone who wants to shoot a movie...

9. Religious holidays should be celebrated at home and in a house
of
worship, not in public schools or on public property.

So, you can wear clothes that say "who you are", but I can't wear a
cross? Again, you are not the party of choice. you are the party of
censorship and totalitarian leadership...

- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

Wearing a cross is not usually considered a "religious celebration" in
the traditional sense, eh?

Military recruiters need monitors to make sure they don't bullship
naive
kids into military service.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Hey, these are adults, years beyond the age of 14 which you seem to
have picked as adult. How about monitors to keep teachers from
bullshipping naive (6 year olds) into a gay lifestyle, or professors
from bullshipping niave students into a life of drug use and
irresponsible sex? Half the country is against that too, but you want
monitors for only your issues, self indulgent, hypocrytical, that is
now the core of your party..

How about keeping an eye on recruiters so they don't try to sign up
autistic
kids? You'd better address this question, or I'll cut off your fun for
the
rest of the day.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

One incident, not a proven pattern? One sided reporting, not all the
facts? Outright made up? All of these are possiblities? The problem is
you beleive it simply because if fits the mold...


Two separate questions, requiring two separate answers. Keep it short.

1) Are you saying that the one incident didn't occur? Yes, or no?

2) If the incident didn't occur, why did a judge hear the case?