Timothy Crowley wrote:
On Sep 27, 4:26 pm, Rudy Canoza wrote:
On Sep 27, 6:42 am, Timothy Crowley wrote:





On Sep 26, 8:03 pm, Rudy Canoza wrote:
Timothy Crowley wrote:
On Sep 26, 1:38 pm, T Jr Hardman
wrote:
Timothy Crowley wrote:
On Sep 26, 11:54 am, Rudy Canoza wrote:
Answer the question, crawley: why aren't
American Indians citizens of the U.S.
Who told you that they are not? Dance, fool.
They were specifically excluded,
Yeah and we had slaves once. No more.
American Indians *still* are not citizens
yes, Rudy
No, crawley - they are *NOT* citizens

Actualy, rudy -they ARE citizens

Actually, crawley, your unethical editing of what I
wrote is the certain giveaway that you know you're
wrong, and that I am *RIGHT*, as usual.

American Indians are citizens, crawley, but their
citizenship does *NOT* derive from the citizenship
clause of the 14th Amendment. This is a well known
fact. Their citizenship, crawley, comes from an act of
Congress in 1924. I have authoritatively informed you
of this, and it is not in dispute by rational people.

YOUR task, you gutless chicken****, is to explain *WHY*
the citizenship clause of the 14th Amendment excludes
American Indians. It does; explain why. Stop ****ing
around and explain. Now.