On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 21:06:01 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 19:46:04 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:18:52 -0400, HK wrote:

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"John H." wrote in message


Here's a site that gives enough information for people who know
something
about pistols.
http://www.gunblast.com/Ruger_SP101.htm

Call your local police station and ask whether it's legal to use
google
in
your town. That should help you find the information you need.



Long one of my favorite shooting sites, but you can see the desperation
in the right's politics...he's endorsed Tired Old Fred, with the same
ideas that brought us...Iraq.


Actually, Harry, we're not discussing politics at all. We're discussing
the
frame used for the Ruger SP101.

There is no "we" that includes you until you spend a day or ten reading.
Otherwise, you can't possibly know what you're talking about. Is your
public
library open on weekends? Does the "home" have a shuttle bus that'll bring
you there?


See previous answer to you. And, see answer to JimH. And, see answer to
Harry. You guys have a lot of words to say, but none have shown anything
that says the Ruger SP101, a .357 Magnum revolver, was built on a .38
frame.

I can't believe that of you five people, *none* of you would come up with
the proof, if it exists, simply to prove me wrong...although I've not
asserted that it *wasn't* built on a .38 frame.



So, if someone else has knowledge, they are required to dredge up sources
for you, while you sit on your wet diaper and watch television.

Not a chance.


Doug, I'm thinking there are no sources saying the Ruger SP101, .357 Magnum
revolver, was built on a .38 frame. I've looked at a couple dozen sites. I
did find that the SP101 was built as a .22 calibre. So it's possible to buy
a Ruger .22 on a .357 Magnum frame, but I could find nothing stating the
..357 was built on a .38 frame.

Do you reckon Ruger is keeping it hidden from the public.