On Sep 4, 2:23?pm, HK wrote:
Jim wrote:

"Chuck Gould" wrote in message
roups.com...
On Sep 4, 11:48?am, "Eisboch" wrote:
"Eisboch" wrote in message

news:IIOdnT69_fhHOUDbnZ2dnUVZ_j2dnZ2d@giganews. com...

I don't disagree with most of the above, except it would surprise
me if,
as a Federal Government Agency, that the Coast Guard had different
scripts
in the training programs.
I've never heard a Coast Guard Pan Pan call in your area, so I can't
judge.

BTW ... the "script" around here is close to .... "vessels in the
area are
instructed to keep a sharp lookout and to provide assistance, if
possible"

The wording may not be exact ... I'll check it when I get back to
the boat
and look it up along with the "legal obligation" to assist reference I
alluded to. My "stuff" is on the boat.

Eisboch

I don't recall hearing the term "sharp lookout" used in the standard
marine assistance broadcast in the NW.

Could you get the script and post it here? We must have accurate
information.

Ol' Chuck has his dukes up and is ready, willing and able to fight
everyone over everything.

I think we need our own Homeland Security warning system to accommodate
Chuck's dark-sided moods:

http://tinyurl.com/38zfcm- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

???????????????

Eisboch and I were comparing the verbiage used in marine assistance
request broadcasts from two different USCG districts. How is that a
fight?

I fail to see where either one of us told the other "You're wrong...."