View Single Post
  #5   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
Chuck Gould Chuck Gould is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,117
Default Valuation of boats

On Aug 29, 11:34?am, "Ed Forsythe"
wrote:
Of course there are. There are at least two "meaningful" books and they are
the same sources that banks and loan agencies use to evaluate loan
collateral. The best known are NADA and The BUC Book. Both are excellent
price info sources for both new and used boats of all shapes, sizes, age,
and condition.
Ed F.


Those books *will* tell you what a bank or a credit union will loan on
a boat. Granted.

Two problems; you're unlikely to find anybody at the bank or credit
union who has one for sale at that price- and unlikely to find anybody
at the bank or credit union willing to buy one at that price.

There's a major difference between collateral formulations and market
value.

Back when I worked as a yacht broker, I had a customer who absolutely
fell head over heels for a boat. The customer had done a lot of
shopping, and felt very comfortable with the offer that he made and
that (after a lot of arm twisting) the seller reluctantly accepted.
The guy couldn't have been happier........

The deal was subject to the buyer obtaining financing- a very typical
situation.

The afternoon after the original paperwork had been signed the very
happy buyer had done the biggest 180 possible. He was yelling and
screaming about my "dishonesty" and charging me with trying to cheat
him out of a considerable sum of money. "You led me to believe this
boat was worth the money, and my credti union looked it up in their
book and you are way, way, way high. I wouldn't buy this boat from you
at this point even if you could get the seller to bring the price
down, I don't like being lied to and cheated!"

I trotted out all the reported sales on comparable boats in the region
during the previous 18 months. Most were at figures even higher than
the buyer and seller had originally agreed upon. Made no difference.
"Of course you're just cherry picking the few sales that make the deal
look good! The only people I can trust o be on my side in this deal
are the folks at the credit union, and they tell me I'm being cheated
and so that's good enough for me!"

Refunded the guy's deposit and off he went. Sold the boat shortly
thereafter for even more money than the credit union blowout had
agreed to pay, so the seller was ultimately happy to.

Months and months later I ran into the credit union buyer again, and I
asked if he had ever purchased a boat. He got pretty upset when he
answered, "I keep trying, but I can't find an honest broker. Every
time I think I've made a deal, the Credit Union tells me I'm paying
way too much for the boat. I'm about ready to give up, you guys are
all crooks!"

In the final analysis, a boat is worth what a willing buyer will pay a
willing seller within a reasonable period of time. There's no reason
that the number has to have anything to do with some arbitrary figure
published in a book. Boats don't sell at wholesale auction like cars
do, and don't retail in sufficient quantity to establish a trend based
solely on make and model. Seller A's derelict 1990 scow of a boat that
needs to be all but given away simply to find somebody willing to take
it doesn't *really* reduce the value of Seller B's well kept, bristol
version of the same boat- even though some guy selling books for a
living (and who never saw either vessel) will undoubtedly construct a
numerical average between the two transactions.

By the way: NADA = National Association of Automobile Dealers. Yeah,
the local used car guy ought to be an expert on boat values.... :-)

BUC= We used to use the BUC book in the boat donation business. You
want a sky high value (for purposes of establishing the amount of a
tax write off)? It's in the BUC book, baby. Gotta be something wrong
with a book that can be used to put as much or more cash in a donor's
pocket (if he's in the 40% tax bracket) than he would ever realize by
selling the boat outright, wouldn't you think?