BoatBanter.com - View Single Post

HK

wrote:
On Aug 28, 10:25 am, wrote:
On Aug 28, 10:09 am, HK wrote:

wrote:
On Aug 28, 9:41 am, HK wrote:
wrote:
Larry Craig has been outspoken in opposition to gay rights issues, and
he is a "favorite" of crazy right-wing organizations, such as the
"Family Research Council."
Now it starts coming together, the guy was set up and handled it
wrong. The problem with democratic activists and paid operatives, (and
some parker captains) is they have no problem lying or cheating to get
to where they need to be, so which one was the cop, activist, or
bought and paid for? Of course, there is also the blackmail option, I
would like to know if Hillary had his FBI files in her office.
Set up? Apparently Senator Craig entered a men's room known to be
frequented by those looking for gay encounters, and "signaled" a cop in
the next stall. He admitted this, and entered a plea. Are you saying
that everyone knew Craig was going to that men's room for a "date," and
they were waiting for him? :}
Man, you need to cut back on whatever psychotropics you are taking.
Oh, and once again, I don't care who Senator Craig diddles. It's only of
interest to me because he is yet another example of a
right-wing-extremist sexual hypocrite.
Apparently he plead to lewd conduct, not the events as you describe
them, in fact he has stated his side of the story and it's nothing
like you said. But you just keep making up facts as you go along, your
comrades don't mind a little dishonesty when it comes to politics.
Again, no moral core, just power. Like I said in another post. I have
heard two top dems (Schumer and Lannie Davis) both in the last 24
hours admit Gonzales was a good AG, they just did not like his
politics, period. That is not democracy, that is not American.
So, tell us, and don't mince your words. What sort of "lewd conduct"
might a 62-old US Senator engage in in a men's room at an airport, a
men's room known to be a place gays use for assignations?
I'm not surprised that Craig's side of the story is different from what
actually happened. Are you?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
You have to understand my point of view. Basically I think it is
another setup, so most of the rest is moot. The vast left wing
conspiracy always goes directly at whatever cause the righty has, the
numbers just don't add up. I'm not surprised the democratic activist
cops story is what it is either, hope he got paid well for his treason.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Anyway, according to the report, Craig "tapped his foot in a manner
recognized by the officer as a signal for sex" !? He tapped his foot?
This was a setup, plain and simple. The guy walked in and took a crap
in the middle of a "show of force" sting on the part of the local PD.
As to the plea, it was probably a bad decision, but can you imagine if
he had gone to trial? The haters and bigots on the left would have had
a field day, probably made the right decision in that case. Just
happens one of Clintons investigators dug it up, nothing new, like I
said, if you can't win in the voting booth...

Craig did more than tap his foot.