On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 19:05:29 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"Calif Bill" wrote in message
...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"BAR" wrote in message
. ..
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Calif Bill" wrote in message
...
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"CalifBill" wrote in message
...
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"BAR" wrote in message
. ..
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"BAR" wrote in message
...

Just like the bunny, you go on and on and on. Why don't you
go on someplace
else?
--
John H
Why don't you go **** yourself, diaper boy?
More insight into Doug's personality disorder.



It's amusing to see how you behave when someone deflates your
theories by asking you a question you're too stupid to answer.
I have one of the toughest skins in this entire group. You on
the other hand have one of the weakest skins.

You believe you are owed a response to every question you pose.
You need to get over that hang-up and just deal with USENET as
it is, a place where you can come and talk with, BS with and
ignore anyone you want.

Tell me what the least expensive family health insurance plan
costs in Rochester NY. At least take a guess.
Why?
Your "why" was answered yesterday. You cannot make claims
involving numbers unless you have the numbers. You will now
disagree, something that's sadly predictable.

Because insurance costs in Rochester, New York only concern
someone who lives there. And so you are the only one here who
gives a crap about Rochester insurance costs. Do your own work,

He made a general statement which applied to the entire nation.
Without knowing specifics, his statement was meaningless. Try
reading more of the messages in a thread before commenting.

I read the thread. He probably cares less what insurance costs in
Rochester. Maybe Frostbite runs up the rates. Or winter
alcoholism. He may be able to look up policies in his area with some
interest.


Whatever. It's about $675.00, unless you're on NY's poverty plan. Not
funny.

That doesn't seem to be out of line for what you get in case of an
emergency or life threatening situation.


True, but if I recall, the poverty plan becomes available at an income
level of 42K. While it may seem that a family with maybe 2 kids should
be able to manage on (picking a number here) 45K, there are families
whose lifestyles were based on let's say 75K, but their employers shut
down. So, suddenly, the "opportunity" to pay for the insurance no
longer exists. Here, Kodak is an example.


Then you have to change your lifestyle. Get a different career. You
may have to flip burgers for awhile, but no where is it declared that if
you have a $75k job, you always get to live that lifestyle. And if you
lived a $45k lifestyle while making $75k, your investments would tide
you over.


You're right. It's easy to get a different career, usually in a day or
two, especially if your specialty was film emulsions. Thanks for clearing
this up for me.


Do you have a degree in chemistry? Or just poured the emulsions into a
vat? You may have to move, you may have to go back to school, you may have
to go to a $40k job and not buy a car every 4 years. You get unemployment
for up to 26 weeks. Time to find another job or career. You may have to
move. Life is tough at times, but this is not a world with guaranteed
lifetime employment.


I said you were right. Therefore, any time a family suddenly cannot afford
insurance, it's their fault for reproducing outside of your approved
criteria, and having too many luxuries.

You're right. All done.


Well, we're all glad that's done and you're satisfied. Now, how about
telling us about your boat, and take the political crap someplace else?
--
John H