On Aug 10, 9:20 am, Gene Kearns
wrote:

Here's a good discussion.

http://www.coyoteblog.com/coyote_blo...ial-us-cli.hml

I don't think I'd waste any more time on the coyoteblog.com... they
must not do *any* fact checking! McIntyre (whose experience is mineral
exploration) and McKitrick (an economist) published their works in a
Non-Peer-Reviewed Social Science Journal because they were turned down
for publication by more appropriate venues.

McIntyre and McKitrick's shaky position was debunked nearly 3 years
ago..http://www.realclimate.org/index.php?p=11

--

Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC.

Homepagehttp://pamandgene.idleplay.net/

Seems all the comments on the article question its reliablility.
Personally I beleive it goes beyond weather weather man is causing
global warming, to weather GW as it is being described even exists.
When you have people like Al Gore making tons of money and working
toward his socialistic view of "wealth redistribution" (which is
probably the driving factor behind the GW scam) , to weather channel
reporters calling for the silence and expulsion of any critics, I
smell a big frekin' rat. If we accept GW, we must accept the
tremendous taxation and political fallout that will come with it.
Listen folks, the numbers are being fudged across the board, critics
are being expelled from the conversation, the rest is based on
assumptions and predictions, doesn't this make you suspicious?