View Single Post
  #90   Report Post  
Bert Robbins
 
Posts: n/a
Default Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in the teeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
John H wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 13:27:10 -0400, Harry Krause

wrote:

John H wrote:

If a traditional conservative was a liberal, then he/she is a

neoconservative.
Perhaps you mean to say that Rush, Coulter, etc. are right wing

extremists. I
don't agree with that, but unless they were former liberals, which

they may have
been, then they aren't neoconservatives.

Fortunately for you, you don't have to qualify in knowledge of modern
English in order to babysit as a sub...


Harry, you've shown your colors. Goodbye.

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!



John, it isn't my problem that you are a simple-minded fool, lazy, and
cannot figure out the modern-day meaning of a word in common usage. It
is, however, a problem for the school district where you sub. That and
your disdain for the black students in the schools where you sub make
you quite a piece of work.


Great you can now add situational definitions to your contributions to
society.

If you weren't so intellectually lazy and working so hard at being
disengenuous, you'd know that "neoconservative refers to the extremist
right-wing ideology of the current Republican leadership which, though
it sprung out of the conservative movement, isn't conservative at all in
any traditional sense (in that radicalism is, by definition, not
conservative). This definition seems to be the dominant one."


Please provide a reputable lexical source that defines neoconservative as
you do?

No cite for you. Easy enough to find.


Meaning, Harry is lazy and can't support his argument!