On Jul 11, 10:45?am, wrote:
On Jul 11, 1:08 pm, Chuck Gould wrote:





On Jul 11, 8:38?am, wrote:

On Jul 11, 4:31 am, Chuck Gould wrote:

We need to come together. It's time to stop blaming everything on
Clinton, for sure, and it's about time to start trying to fix,
together, anything that may have gone sideways under the present
Executive.

And if I answer your three questions, will you let me cross your
bridge? Sandy Berger made sure we will never know how much the
Clintons were involved, had knowledge of, or even told the Bush
administration. Specualate all you want, scream from the top of the
mountain that you beleive the Clintons to the end, then why did they
have to destroy documents, I specualte that they did not tell Bush
everything, but I won't stand on a stump and declare it "truth" beyond
doubt, and call anyone who does not agree, stupid...

????????????????????????????

Thanks for demonstrating my previous point, but beyond that I have no
idea why you would suggest I'm screaming from a mountaintop that I
"believe the Clintons to the end".

Just found it interesting how you worded it. Defending the Clinton
admin and pointing at the current admin at the same time as saying we
need to stop doing that.. And I know you don't just whip stuff off the
cuff



If jps isn't going to accomplish anything by "blaming" Bush and his
conservative supporters (and he isn't), what is to be accomplished by
"blaming" Clinton? Looks like I touched a nerve- sorry. Didn't mean to
put you into a defensive mode

No defensive mode, just thought it funny to say we got to "stop
blaming", while blaming, that's all. I usually expect more of you.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text

When did I "defend" Clinton? I said it was time to stop blaming him
for everything. (Apparently you disagree, and feel that he should
continue to be blamed for everything?) I also said that it would be
more important to solve any particular problems thta may have cropped
up during the two Bush terms than to waste time blaming anybody for
those. How is that offensive? I guess if you feel that the suggestion
that anything Bush has done might be less than absolutely perfect in
every respect is a harsh and unwarranted "blame",......but he'd be the
first human being in a million years to attempt such a complex task
and not screw up a few things in the process.

The only person I was blaming, at all, was jps for stirring up schidt.