wrote in message
oups.com...
On Jun 27, 11:25 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:

I'm kidding, it's late, did you not see the "winky" face? This is
really not as important to me as you think it is. Tell you what, come
up to CT someday, we'll go fishin', maybe we can get the Capt. to come
along, we can argue, he can drive.

The type of boat trip I'd like to take with the captain involves fishing.
For you, it would involve cinder blocks. I take everything you say
seriously, and for that reason, you are a threat to children who come
into
contact with you, and a threat to the future of this great country.

Wow, you are a genuine internet hero mr. k, watch who you threaten
though, someone might take you more seriously than I do.




Sorry about the strong language. I was tired and out of patience.

Look: You pursued a conversation as if you knew what you were talking about,
and it reached the point where you were inventing theories and using words
that made no sense. When you finally realized this, you decided to set your
hair on fire in two ways: You asked for my qualifications, and then said
something about lightweight education, or whatever your words were. The
absurdity of your approach is obvious. By way of analogy, you believe that
although Tom can probably put people on a school of fish with a high degree
of success because he's been fishing the same region forever, he is not
qualified. You're also suggesting that his qualifications are identical to
those of a boater who drops a hook in the water once every two or nine
years.

That's just plain silly.

None of this matters, though, since it in no way addresses the experiment in
the newspaper article, which you still haven't read.