On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 09:01:16 -0700, Chuck Gould
wrote:



Chuck, I cannot understand why the folks talking the most about mankind's
contribution to global warming are the same ones fighting the use of
nuclear energy. Ah yes, there is a waste problem. But, it is minimal, given
the recycling technology, compared to the advantages of nuclear energy.

Perhaps this is one of the reasons many folks think the liberals are
'crying wolf' more than actually trying to solve the problem. Of course,
with folks like Al Gore, the whole issue is a money-making proposition.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I don't believe "the liberals" or anybody else can solve the problem
at this point. First we have to reach a broad agreement, based solely
on scientific evidence and not talk show or political rhetoric,
whether the problem exists and whether human activities contribute to
it. If we decide that there is a dire problem and that human influence
is making the situation much worse, then we should be prepared to take
whatever steps are required.

Right now we have group one: "There's no such thing as global warming.
It's a liberal conspiracy to make George Bush look bad. And even if
there is, my personal consumption of fossil fuels and other resources
absolutely has nothing to do with it at all."

And we're got group two: "The planet is heating up so quickly due to
the production of excess greenhouse gas by industry and consumers that
we're all doomed to a miserable fate. Life as we know it may end in
the next couple of decades. We need to park our cars, unplug our
lightbulbs and computers, turn off the heating and air conditioning,
and return to living in caves."

The earth doesn't give a darn about political or personal opinions,
and if there is a problem we should be prepared to take realistic and
practical steps in response. Extermism on either side of the issue,
before conclusive evidence is at hand, serves nobody. Extremism will
only forestall the implementation of corrective measures if it becomes
evident that corrections are required.

Boaters should be concerned about this debate more than many other
groups. We are more dependent upon winds and weather, which can be
altered significantly by a major climate change. We are also more at
risk for having our recreational activities black-listed by folks
seeking ways that *others* should sacrifice to promote a healthy
environment.

I should have said, "Wy are the folks talking the most about mankind's
contribution to global warming are the same ones fighting the use of
nuclear energy?"