On Jun 14, 3:52 pm, Charlie Morgan wrote:
On 14 Jun 2007 14:50:02 -0500, Dave wrote:

On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 12:39:24 -0700, Joe said:

Know any lawyers who will take on a slander lawsuit for 25%?

All the lawyers here want 33.3%.... that could be a fortune.

Not the kind of law I do. But I suspect shopping for trial lawyers based
primarily on the fee they quote, particularly on a contingency, may not be
the best idea.

He'll also have to find a lawyer that doesn't know what's required for a slander
suite. Not only is it doubtful that Joe would have standing, but I'm pretty sure
that his wife would have to prove directly connected financial loss. It's fun to
read his posts on the subject however.

I'm wondering if the apology he wants from me would be at all similar to the
heartfelt one he is about to make to Bobsprit for all the terrible things he's
said about not only Bob's wife, but Bob's wonderful son, as well. That might be
useful as a guide. G

CWM

Post 1 negetive thing I've ever said about Suzy or Thomas.

I'm not the one who is going to be filing the suit..you did not
slander me, if you did I could care less.

You ****ed me off..and slandered my wife thinking you could get away
with it. She has not seen the filth you wrote yet..but will.

BTW the lawyer said since your statement was made via broadcast media
it is considered libel, rather than slander, because the statement has
the potential to reach a very wide audience.

Would you like to repeat what you said about my wife?

Joe
You better wipe that grin off your face.