* Cessna 310 wrote, On 5/31/2007 9:43 PM:

My mistake. I read the Exec Summary, scanned through a lot of the body.
It just read like an earlier study that has been so torn apart that it
no longer has any value. I need to go through the references to see if
the results of that bogus study (or others similarly criticized works)
have been used.

The Third Assessment certainly had a few vocal critics, and a small
part of the criticism may have been deserved. But "torn apart"? I
hardly think so. The proof is that the AR4 reaffirms the basic
conclusions of the TAR. I thought they even had a press conference
last month to report that this report was even more dire than the
previous.