Bart wrote in news:1180468403.189828.125140
@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com:

On May 29, 2:19 pm, Fuzzy Logic wrote:

Since when does vandals=liberals?

And where is the tie-in to alt.sailing.asa? Maybe try alt.crime?

It is posted as off-topic. OT

It is a good assumption--the labeling of Veterans
as criminals is the common view of the liberals.

The post mentioned vandals which some may attribute to being liberals but it's a stretch. I saw no mention of
veterans as criminals?

Who recently has called conservatives Nazi's?

One person calling one other person a name does not necessarily reflect the opionions of the whole group.

Always it is the liberals who hate without logic
and use this label, unjustly on conservatives and
veterans. Most recently I heard Rudy Guiliani
called a Nazi. And he is a moderate Republican.

And who better to discuss Nazi's than a Jew.

************************************************** ********
http://www.jewishworldreview.com/jeff/jacoby010203.asp

Sliming conservatives as Nazis often seems to be the
first refuge of liberal hate-talkers.

There is never any uproar when a liberal uses hate
speech against a Republican.

No prominent Democrat spoke with equal bluntness
about Harry Belafonte, who described Secretary of State
Colin Powell's relationship to President Bush as that of a
bootlicking plantation "slave" who curries favor in order "to
come into the house of the master."

And no prominent liberal blasted Gerardo Villacres, the
head of the Hispanic American Chamber of Commerce,
when he likened California businessman Ron Unz to a
Nazi for financing ballot campaigns to end bilingual education.

************************************************** ***************
There is no debate any more between the left and the right.
The left attacks without offering a solution. The right is always
wrong, despite having the majority. I'm glad of all the kooks
on the left. They make it so easy for people to chose sides.
The few that go left, push more people to the right.

IMO partisan politics needs to go away. Why can't people run on a platform of their personal beliefs? Voters
would actually have to pay attention to what politicians are saying and vote accordingly.