Proper interpretation of no-wake rules
"Gene Kearns" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 24 May 2007 17:46:01 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:
Dear Gene:
Nothing you posted refutes the information I provided in my original
message. In fact, you provided information which supports what I said.
Here.
I'll edit your message so it's less cluttered. Everything within the plus
signs is your new message:
snips
Check your threading.....
My post was in response to Midlant. I wholeheartedly concur with your
position.
Dear Gene:
Pardon my conflatulence.
:-)
|