Thread: Death Wish?
View Single Post
  #46   Report Post  
posted to alt.sailing.asa
Wilbur Hubbard Wilbur Hubbard is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,869
Default Death Wish?


"Joe" wrote in message
ps.com...
On May 19, 8:02 am, Frank Boettcher wrote:
On 18 May 2007 20:10:10 -0700, Joe wrote:





On May 18, 8:11 pm, "Capt. JG" wrote:
"Joe" wrote in message


roups.com...


On May 18, 10:28 am, "Capt. JG" wrote:
"Joe" wrote in message


groups.com...


On May 17, 3:03 pm, "Capt. JG" wrote:
"Scotty" wrote in message


m...


"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
"Joe" wrote in message


Yeah, that's the ticket... fire or at least blame the
workers for
_negotiating_ successfully.


the ''workers'', and I use that term loosely, only do /
vote
what the mob / union bosses tell them to.


SBV


So what? At this point, who's going to be harmed, according
to Joe's
post...
the boss' or the workers?


--
"j" ganz -Hidequotedtext -


- Show quoted text -


Hey Jon. In case you have not noticed the Americaqn auto
industry is
in deep trouble because of all the dead weight the unions
strapped
them with. The American auto industry spends more money on
heathcare
for RETIRED employees than they spend on steel. Just how is
any
company going to make a profit when they are forking out so
much? The
only way they can compete in a world market is to start over
without
the dead weight.


Joe


Agreed. However, 100s of 1000s are dependent on the agreements
that were
reached when the industry was healthy. You can't cut people off
at the
knees, so something needs to be worked out... gee, here's a
solution...
universal healthcare. Everyone is then covered and the auto
industry can
recover. Sorry... I know that's pretty liberal of me. g


--
"j" ganz -Hidequoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Well the union people and bean counters had billions to invest
and
manage to cover the cost of heathcare ect and did a **** poor
job of
it. When you retire you have the option of taking all your stock
and
selling it and investing in other forms of retirement. Let's
face it,
the days of 20 years with a company and a gold watch retirement
party
and lifetime pensions are over. If you wan't anything for your
retirement you better leverage your career now and plan for your
own
retirement.


Here is the choice (reality) for for the American auto industry.
1. Start over without all the dead weight, so we can compete on
a
world market.
2. No USA auto makers.


Joe


I guess that begs the question... do we need GM if Toyota builds
cars in the
US?


--
"j" ganz -Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


I'll never buy a toyata, or any other jap mobile.
Having a strong industrial base is what made our country great, you
may be happy building Japan, but Id rather support Americans.


If I had my way, I'd impose a trade tariff that would level the
field
with the japs and preserve the retirements that our mfgr's bear the
burden of. 40-50% import tax. And no country would be able to sell
us
more than we sell them.


Joe


And you'd end up with high priced junk that no one could afford but
would have to buy because they would not have a choice.

The U. S. Auto industry had all the opportunity in the world to
improve. They could have embraced Demming when he was trying to move
them in the right direction. They wouldn't give him the time of day,
laughed him out of the country. He went to Japan and the rest is
history. Statistical Process Control became the foundation for DOE,
lean manufacturing and all the other innovative methods the Japanese
use to make the highest quality, massed produced products in the
world. They consider him a national treasure. An American.

The playing field with the Japs is level. They build here and have
to
endure the same environmental, safety, workers comp foolishness,
litigation environment, potential for labor organization, that the
big
three do. Difference is they have adopted methods to do it better,
while the U. S. corporations continue to just pay their executives
higher bonuses and stock options for crappy performance, and boards
of
directors go along because they are at the trough too.

As I type, Toyota is building an assembly plant twelve miles, as the
crow flies, from my house. Going to provide 4000 quality jobs. In an
area of the country where all the U. S. Corporations are sending
those
"extravagant" $10/hour jobs to china (theres where you have a playing
field that is in full tilt) so they can pay $1/hr to offer you crap
at a price that makes a killing for them. Now, you drive what you
want but who do you think I will support?

Frank- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Frank American mfgs use Black belt, Kitzan, ISO, and have pretty much
adopted the same quality control standards as the Japs. But you are
correct Demming was the best. America missed out big time on taking
advantage of what he was teaching.

That's not the issue. The issue is the massive overhead from unions
ect..that the US mfg. have to lug around. GM is 10,000.00 dollars in
the hole before they even start building a car.

And if stock owners and the boards feel they need to pay top money to
attract top talent what's wrong with that? Again no one is going to
leverage your career for you now days, so you need to leverage your
own skills and manage your own retirement.

Joe


You are 100% correct. Because of liberals and their love of the
socialist agenda, their beloved socialist unions have destroyed the very
fabric of capitalism in the U.S. auto industry. Socialism is a Ponzi
scheme whereby sooner or later one must pay the piper. It just so
happens now IS later as far as the U.S. auto industry goes. You just
can't compete being forced to carry all that dead weight in the form of
retired workers. It ain't gonna happen. But, the handwriting is on the
wall. Even the French are finally getting a clue how bad socialism is
and how it's wrecked the economy in their country.

Wilbur Hubbard