"Maxprop" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
...
"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 7 May 2007 20:41:05 -0700, "Capt. JG"
said:

Err...Jon, that piece didn't say anything about the piece on gun
crime. It
was a simple hit-piece attacking Stoessel himself. Not a particularly
good
hit-piece at that. Reminded me of the FBI reports tagging X as an
"associate
of organized crime" because X once ate at Umberto's Clam House.


Exactly my point... Stoessel is a right-wing stooge.

IOW, rather than dealing with the message you'd prefer to attack the
messenger.

Why am I not surprised?


There's nothing "deal with" as far as the message goes, because of the
source. Why am I not surprised you don't get that.

The same could be said about you. (left-wing stooge) But Dave and others
have argued the gist of the messages with you, rather than just
proclaiming you to be a left-wing stooge and dismissed therein. Your
dismissal of Stossel is pointless and disingenuous.

Max


I don't think I can be categorized so simply. I rarely point to a left-wing
apologist as a source of fact. Please feel free to repost an example if you
can. I can easily dismiss him, because he has no rational argument.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com