On Wed, 02 May 2007 16:16:21 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 02 May 2007 12:00:02 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Wed, 02 May 2007 09:34:13 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:

wrote:
On 02 May 2007 02:14:37 GMT, "Fred Garvin, Male Prostitute"
wrote:

In message , Harry Krause
sprach
forth the following:

The inspector general's report said MacDonald tried to remove
protections for a rare jumping mouse
My copy of the Constitution does not contain "protections for a rare
jumping mouse". What Article and Section of yours does?
I don't think the Constitution says anything about driving while
impaired, bank robbery, or child porn so, shall I conclude that they
are all undesirable, unconstitutional, illegal, and unenforceable
laws?
There's an entire subpopulation of "righties" who have no understanding
of the Constitution, the government, or process.

You mean like "hate speech" laws?

Oh, I think there's a place for federal laws against certain kinds of
"hate speech." There are certain thoughts involving violence and hate
that one should not be able to say in public.

Give me an example of "hate speech".

"Cram it up your ass Doug. Sideways."

That's not hate speech - that's a love tap. :)