posted to rec.boats
|
external usenet poster
|
|
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 57
|
|
Anti-environmentalist quits US fish, wildlife & parks post
On Wed, 02 May 2007 08:49:22 -0400,
wrote:
On 02 May 2007 02:14:37 GMT, "Fred Garvin, Male Prostitute"
wrote:
In message , Harry Krause sprach
forth the following:
The inspector general's report said MacDonald tried to remove
protections for a rare jumping mouse
My copy of the Constitution does not contain "protections for a rare
jumping mouse". What Article and Section of yours does?
I don't think the Constitution says anything about driving while
impaired, bank robbery, or child porn so, shall I conclude that they
are all undesirable, unconstitutional, illegal, and unenforceable
laws?
No these are all perfectly appropriate areas for states to legislate
against. I am not nearly as sure that they are in any way appropriate
areas for the federal government to legislate about except to the
extent that they somehow impair "interstate commerce". I can't for the
life of me see how child porn does this, but that is the justification
used for making it a federal issue. States should make it a capital
offense, however, in my opinion.
Dave Hall
|