JimC wrote:
Scotty's sarcastic notes didn't address the gist of my original note, of
course. (They never do. - He seems to be afraid to actually get into a
discussion relating to the substance of what was posted. Like a spoiled
little brat, if he doesn't like the gist of the discussion, he hides
behind his snide, cutesy remarks so he won't have to actually respond to
what was said. - Knowing that if he did, he would get his ass kicked.)

But in any event, does anyone doubt what was stated in my post regarding
Wilbur's problems?

Jim




JimC wrote:



Wilbur Hubbard wrote:

There are sailboats and there are sailboats. Your boat should be a
reflection of your own life's ambition. If you are just a poor
schmuck living in a double-wide in Pennsylvania then anything you can
come up with to sail I say more power to you. A working man has to do
what he can to get out on the water and should realize even an
unnoteworthy vessel is better than no vessel at all.




Keeping this in mind, don't you think it would be wise for a lawyer
to show up in this group with boat having a quality name. A Hinckley,
a Swan, a Wauquiez, a Morris, an Oyster, a Contest. You get the
picture. Could you honestly have much confidence in a lawyer who
could not afford one of the above or was so ignorant that he sailed a
MacGregor 26?
---------------------------------------------------------------------



To anyone who hasn't realized it, Wilbur (or whoever he is) posted the
initial note trolling in an attempt to get a response from me (the
only lawyer on the ng who owns a MacGregor). Since I didn't take the
bait, he was stuck with all the indignant responses from everyone else
and more or less made an ass of himself. Sorry, Wilbur. - Better luck
next time!

As for my legal practice, although I'm technically retired, I have all
the work I can handle, thank you.

Jim

Take a pill, Jim...you're sounding strident...