The Secretary of HomIntern wrote in
news:6JwOh.111538$fo5.99799@trnddc07:

Steve Leyland wrote:
In ,
Puck typed:
: "Steve Leyland"
wrote
: in :
:
:: okay, I've already taken #1 on this already in my sig, but thought
:: some of you might like inclusion on this new lits.
:: all applications for "Lits Slut" numbers should be posted in this
:: thread. you'll need to provide conclusive proof of lits sluttiness
:: for consideration and kooks need not apply.
:
: Does one not need to utter words of W0nership before one can feature
: in sigs? I have taken no greater pleasure than being TOS'd and
: sig-featured in my brief, and wholly inaccurate, career as a
: trollette. But right here, right now (Norman Cook, let's not go
: there) I have nothing worthy. Soz.

my dear puck, it is a lits of lits sluts, not name-dropping sluts who
shagged norman cook.
You always have to bring yer momma into this, eh my owned tard???
:
: To top that off, I have no Flonkness.

and no sig, so why would you want this honour?

We are nothing if we can't at least strive for originality.